Weekend Approaching

I wanted to write this late day report for 2 important reasons-

1. You’ve been filling up the comments section on the last report, so I thought you needed a fresh space to write in  🙂

2. Even thought things are still playing out pretty much  as expected in certain areas, this is just a reminder about being able to sleep over the weekend.

 

Lets do a quick review…

‘Reduce risk’ does not mean our analysis is wrong, sell everything.  SO far we do see a little improvement in GOLD SILVER & MINERS today . Reduce risk means that we should ask ourselves,

“CAN I SLEEP COMFORTABLY being heavily invested  going into this weekend?”    

 

This is just a reminder that Sunday night could see Gold surge $30 , or drop $30.  We cannot say for a certainty,  so please just position yourself in a way that you can be comfortable.  Lets do a quick review.

.

GOLDS 4 hr chart –  that was a nice surge today.  Possibly a break out if it holds.

GOLD 1

 

GOLD 2 –  Possible cup & handle , volume lighter as the handle dips down & forms.

GOLD #2

 

These are slightly bullish developments.  I would have preferred to see GOLD close above $1100, above it’s 10sma.

.

This chart is Gold as of Thursday.   Also we are expecting that day 34 was the low.  If not and Gold was going to drop again to a new low Sunday,  that would put Gold on day 40 Sunday.   THAT IS VERY STRETCHED , so it becomes more likely that Gold is going to hold up.  Maybe run higher next week.  The C.O.T. is likely very Bullish again. 

GOLD 7 31

 

We are entering the weekend.  I cannot say for certain that Gold wont smack down Sunday night and scare people.  SO RISK MANAGEMENT is important. What can you handle?  This is a personal choice & NOW – before the close, is the time to decide. 

.

MINERS improved a little.   This was our last chart in  Thursdays report. We needed a surge over the 10sma . 

GDX 7-29  2

 

GDX now-  Thats not a surge, but it’s at the 10sma.  GDXJ has crossed above the 10sma at the time of writing.

GDX 7-31

 

Personally,  It doesn’t look like the Miners believe the move.  They usually jump 7%- 10% on a day like this.  JNUG & NUGT would be up 13to 20% .  Right now , many miners are up 3-4%,  a few are 7%.  I checked the GDX: GLD and its slightly higher today,  but very inconsequential at this point. 

 

SO please think about it  and adjust your account to your weekend comfort.  We still have a very bullish set up,  but this has been  another week of no real action.  Boredom can lead to excitement in one quick overnight move, but no one is 100% sure of which direction that will be in.   A quick dip shake out in thin market trading Sunday night could happen.  Day 34 lows makes sense in Gold, but also  the call to adjust or reduce risk is a prudent call.  Why?

Because there is always another trade.  IF gold finally breaks free and goes higher,  I expect much higher prices in the coming weeks. Many Miners will be very profitable, up 50% to 100% possibly. There is no need to feel we are missing the move,  it actually hasn’t really even started yet.

Have a great weekend and thanks for being here!

~ALEX 

 

Forgot to add this from yesterday.  INVERSE HEAD AND DOUBLE SHOULDER

GDX intraday

98 replies
  1. chartfreak1
    chartfreak1 says:

    By the way, I added a chart from yesterday after I released this and proof read it. Its the last chart ( purple one) In case some missed it. You can just scroll up from here.

  2. Simonsays
    Simonsays says:

    A note to Canadians. We are closed on Monday and everyone else is open, so there’s an additional factor consider. I took some of the table for this reason.

  3. Mike
    Mike says:

    Thanks Alex. I’m in light so I’ll take Monday as it comes. As you say if it is going to run, there is plenty of time.

  4. chartfreak1
    chartfreak1 says:

    Hey- I just noticed that that 10sma on GOLD dropped and now we did close over the 10sma on GOLD , GLD, SILVER and GDXJ .
    Thats a bit more encouraging.

          • SonOfGud
            SonOfGud says:

            Alex, how much is the usual time lag between bottom of COT and first impulse moves in price.
            Is there a regular pattern of correlation?

          • chartfreak1
            chartfreak1 says:

            Actually, going from Memory, no lag time.

            I have seen the low come in at a steep sell off and the C.O.T. comes in the week after at lows (because the report is as of Tuesday) . SO basically when we see THE LOWS, the following week COT looks lower, but it is a reflection of Tuesday of that week when the low came in.

            By the way, I liked your E.W. chart posted yesterday

          • SonOfGud
            SonOfGud says:

            Thx,,
            Maria’s sucked me into her Elliot web….. i gone overboard with some larger timeframe GDX EW charts today in the previous thread 🙂

            actually they can be quite good fun to do, when you can make ordered sense out of apparent random noise.

  5. Gary Savage
    Gary Savage says:

    While it doesn’t seem correct to have a second bloodbath phase I wonder if gold might bounce to 1130 (the breakdown) and then turn back down for one more short cycle into an ICL at 1033.

    Every gold bug and hedge fund is probably watching that level and I would think any remaining shorts would cover at that point. While the 50% Fib level (1080ish) should be support I get the feeling that 1033 is much stronger support with much better odds of launching a move capable of breaking back through 1130.

    • Maria
      Maria says:

      That would fit if that small bear flag were labeled 4 of 5, and the break down labeled 5 od 5. Out of pocket now so cant show chart.

      • SonOfGud
        SonOfGud says:

        Just seen this M… from Elliot Wave International.
        (They have that long term truncated 5, with a current AB correction in progress)

          • Maria
            Maria says:

            sooo.. if 5 is truncated… u no what that means… powerful counter move ahead ;o)
            So this 5 is just A finishing… wow .. makes sense .. we are beginning B up… but watch out below when that C down takes place in a few years.. YIKES

          • SonOfGud
            SonOfGud says:

            hmm….velly intellesting.
            Wonder what the $ would be up to if gold went back down to there.

          • Cason
            Cason says:

            You’re waves seem on in that rendidtion but that scenario seems unlikely to me. Up to 1500 and then back to 750 would mean that we are in a secular bear market to enter a bull corrective phase and not current bear market within a secular bull. Which are oppostites, so you’d have to make your higher level waves match also.
            Fundamentally, I think we are past peak gold, so extended time periods below all-in cost of mining are unlikely, imo.

          • Cason
            Cason says:

            No, I meant $750 as in referring to the last EW chart Maria drew that was discussed above. Currently, I think $1000 is definitely in play. Was only saying if we go high enough to confirm a bull market resumption (1500 would do that), I saw it unlikely to re-visit that far below 1K in the near future based on much larger wave (super, is that it?) structure. But only my opinion, which, unfortunately can be wrong at times. 🙂

          • Maria
            Maria says:

            i agree cason… that was just one idea.. nothing i felt anything much about…
            after chatting w/ son today..i think a more shallow retrace is in order..esp following an extended wave 3….
            like this .. perhaps..

          • chartfreak1
            chartfreak1 says:

            Isnt this formation in a Bull Mkt?
            We are in a Bull MKT for gold in my opinion, but a bear mkt correction currently. this doesnt fit a bear mkt correction, right?

          • Maria
            Maria says:

            of course.. add my disclaimer to that.. “im new at this and could be making it all up” .. ;o)

          • chartfreak1
            chartfreak1 says:

            This is what I am seeing as mentioned above, but to $1400’s and then down to 800’s. But I dont share E.W., because it is always changing. I only see it in hindsight, after the fact. It actually has never been predictive enough for me.

          • Maria
            Maria says:

            Yessss.. i know that joke. .sorry cant find the right comment to post to..on my cell.. lol..
            Darn discus comment section..

        • Maria
          Maria says:

          the more i look at that count, the more I dont understand why A is truncated, then the next move for B – is down? Make more sense to me that what they have labeled as B – is really then terminus of A… ????? no??? Unless .. B is beginning as an irregular flat.. ahhh .. hmm i may have just answered my own question..
          thanks for the chat ole chap .. smirk.

          • SonOfGud
            SonOfGud says:

            Thats the problem with EW… so many subjective interpretations.
            As you say, an irregular flat…

          • SonOfGud
            SonOfGud says:

            if indeed wave 5 ended in nov, that presumably can be the only explanation for the lower price since then.

          • SonOfGud
            SonOfGud says:

            .. its probably worth pointing out the other valid wave 4 scenarios, lest we all get depressed ’bout $700 gold 🙂
            That zigzag down is a worst case scenario, isnt it?

            (sorry my current gold price only dated to Nov 14!)

          • SonOfGud
            SonOfGud says:

            tell ya wot.. id quite like a flat that went up to $2000 a couple of times before taking off on wave 5 trip to outer space.
            we could milk that one for all it was worth

          • Maria
            Maria says:

            allllllso .. IF indeed a primary 4 wave is in progress & it is following an “extended” wave 3 — thennn .. the retracement would most likely be shallow…ie. 38.2% which also obeys the law of alternation – since 2 appears to be an impulse – so 4 should be a flat. … correct? ;o)
            sooo.. I pick your GREEN scenario… .

          • SonOfGud
            SonOfGud says:

            Yow.. that is some degree-level EW boffinism your hitting me with there.
            If you said that in a cute Kiwi accent, you could pass for li’l Lara 🙂
            but i do vaguely recall the alternating ‘law’..
            do you have 2nd wave count for 1980 to 1999?

          • Maria
            Maria says:

            hmm…all i got outta that was…my voice isnt cute…
            LOL!!
            which in fact .. it is..;)

            … or so im told … 😉

          • chartfreak1
            chartfreak1 says:

            I see the Purple as currently possible using some of my methods, but the “C” is not as deep as you have shown. Not syre if it needs to be by your methods. I’ have it at $800’s

            However, I’d have the run up with 5 much higher

          • SonOfGud
            SonOfGud says:

            it was just a generic zigzag using Maria’s $700 chart target.
            maybe just as likely to flatten out like that 1980-1999 correction?

            and the 5… just an arbitrary position… i couldnt get any higher space on the chart!

          • SonOfGud
            SonOfGud says:

            yup seems reasonable… think i had something vaguely similar in one of the GDX charts in the previous comments.. (with the expanding 3rd wave?)
            I can follow the unboxed pink numbers 12345, but not any of the lower case roman numerals.
            what waves are they referring to?

          • Maria
            Maria says:

            sorry …should have erased those…the blue is just me counting the subwaves..
            ps. i also use the ‘automated’ EW feature at times just to check to see what it counts..mostly unreliable, but sometimes it helps w/ learning.

          • SonOfGud
            SonOfGud says:

            just noticed, with that EWI chart… the 5 looks particularly short coz they havent used the log scale.
            it wouldve helped

  6. Eifion Jones
    Eifion Jones says:

    Hi Alex. I find it strange that you talk about planning for weekend sleep, when the U.S. Market had closed before this report was sent
    We received it at UK 10 pm ??? Confused
    Eifion

    • chartfreak1
      chartfreak1 says:

      This report was started at 3 p.m. and it took a 1/2 hr to write it up & draw charts.

      I then sent it out a little after 3:30 p.m. while the US markets were open.

      My email auto alert has been slightly delayed lately, so you can see that I put in the ‘comments section’ of the last report that I had a new update.

      Then the alert came through at 3:44 p.m. Eastern time. I know many got it, because they responded in the comments section before the market closed.

      See the attached email alert ( I am signed up so I know if the system is working)
      .

      .

Comments are closed.