Nov 28th – What’s Next?

When you look at the flowers in the above picture, you cannot really tell what the future will hold at this point. It is hopeful as we begin to see growth, but the surrounding conditions are difficult. Will it remain too dry for growth or will some refreshing rains begin to nurture it? And even if all of the conditions exist for solid growth, will it avoid being trampled on? 

What does this have to do with the Precious Metals market? We’ll  compare this flowers future with the dry conditions that we’ve seen in that sector lately and discuss future prospects.

.

After we quickly discuss Oil.

.

WTIC –  Oil put in what looked like a vert strong bullish reversal Monday.  In the reports over the last several weeks, I have been cautioning about Oil and the set up there. OPEC meets this week, so this chart may be thinking that they will cut supply.

wtic-11-28

However, Look up the XLE and the energy stocks that have been doing rather well lately listed on the chart below and they all did THIS when Oil did THAT.  Interesting reaction to Oils bullish move.

oas-11-28

NATGAS –  In the weekend report I was showing how a deep scary sell off into an ICL can flip and suddenly win back all of the losses.  I pointed this out, because we just had a sell off in precious metals that could possibly quickly recover if the Bull in that sector remains strong.   NATGAS continued higher today.

natgas-11-28

Can you imagine if Gold & Miners do what Natgas just did after a little time at the lows? It can happen. 

 .

Yes, it could happen, but many are very hesitant to enter positions now. Why? Partly because of the recent sell off, but also unfortunately a big part of that is apparently due to 1 person in the comments section last week spreading fear while replying to others comments.  There was an emotionally negative tirade, and now that time has passed, maybe it’s my turn to address it?  I was extremely disappointed for the sake of my readers and especially my newer sign ups to have to endure that when they may be looking for my help in the comments section during a difficult time period.  How unfortunate that this was their first time with us during a sell off into an ICL and this constant negative fear laced commentary by 1 person was their ‘welcome to Chartfreak’.  I apologize to them, it is not usually like that here, and it will not be in the future. Unfortunately, I find that this will need to be addressed further at the end of the report. GOLD IS DOWN pre-market, I need to avoid a repeat of last week.

.

GOLD & MINERS

.

GOLD – Day 34 is on the late side for a daily cycle low. Monday Gold put in an unconfirmed swing low, but this late in the cycle count, I would expect that the lows are in place. Miners  have actually already done a little base formation and added one more sign of life too.

gold-11-28

GOLD -Back on Nov 17th, I did mention that it was a conceivable idea that Gold would run the May stops and hit the 61.8% level.

gold-fib

When Gold went there last week, 1 week later, there was panic.

gold-11-23

GDX  went there too, and found support.

If you owned any 3Xx ETF  in the Oct time period, you definitely should have been stopped out. IF NOT, you still might make your money back if the bull remains in tact, but 3x etfs are not supposed to be held on to in a drop.

gdx-11-23

GDX MONDAY– GDX closed above the 10sma today and near the highs of the day.  This helps to confirm that a dcl is likely in place.  I believe that we will find that it is an  ICL when we get a weekly swing low and further signs of strength.   Looking at this chart we see that another solid day of gains could also bring us back to the Oct lows already.

gdx-11-28-low

 

 The question from the weekend report ( and raised again here with the opening theme picture) is , “Will this move continue to grow?” The answer is still unknown at this point.  In a future report, probably Wednesdays, I’m going to show how to analyze this daily cycle and protect ourselves as it unfolds. We should have at least a good week or two to do this with an ICL or even a dcl in place.  Look again at the October dcl, we had a few weeks of price action before the drop.

Did someone come along and step on the growth that we have already seen in this sector in 2016?  Some think that the Trump election has ended Golds bull run, but to me it seems that his spending plan would increase the risk of inflation.  I do not see why this bull should die. The weekend report explained some of what I am watching with the Yen too. We have a little time to watch this daily cycle unfold, and I will discuss what we are looking for in tomorrows report.  Tuesday is upon us, and I believe that Miners could be bought with stops below recent lows. I will explain a bit more at the end of this report too.  Enjoy your Tuesday trading, thanks for being here.

.

~ALEX

.

Trading review

Now let me explain what happens at these lows and what makes this part so difficult.  DCL’s are buying opportunities, but the drop causes fear of more downside, so they are difficult to buy.  1 comment was saying that buying the Oct lows was such a huge ‘horrible’ mistake.  Was it, or is that just an emotional reply? Look at the chart.  The move out of the Oct lows acted correctly for 3-4weeks!  It was a rapid 2-3 days sell off that did ALL of the damage. Look at the Oct lows.  Knowing that it was a DCL, I bought it.  Thinking that that was an ICL, I actually went in heavily at the lows, and then you have to watch how it grows from there.  These can take right off straight up and we’ve seen that in the past.  November highs had this chart looking good, and then we had the election results. A sudden sharp 3 day drop and then a base formed. In 2 days that damage could even be undone ( Remember the NATGAS chart).

gdx-cason

.

Now let’s look at that chart GDX again. Why? Some people have been frightened away from buying, and that is O.K. too. Waiting until we get further confirmation or even until we see if this is a continuing Bull or not is fine, however, we do need to discuss the reality and the perception of the Oct lows & Nov lows. Some want to enter a position but are still nervous from last weeks drama.  The selling was bad for those 3 days and we dont want to have that again, but timing is on our side now and using stops would prevent big losses. So notice that the reality is this…

Reality – October lows were $22.50 area.

Reality – Nov lows are above $20.

 The Drop from the OCT lows to the NOV lows was not much, and a stop would have cut losses.  The rest of the move was a multi week rise and fall of the Oct daily cycle. Not a death defying horrible ugly drop for 3 weeks like some are perceiving it to be. This is not a 3 week drop, it was a big surprise 3 day drop.   Especially if one was holding JNUG or leverage through that drop  would it be painful. Position size is reality too. Our ‘core’ positions were feeling the selling pressure.    Currently if we have a dcl, price should not break the lows for weeks, as seen in October.  One could buy, but you must use stops and honored them if it does.  It is a risk reward set up.  Lower risk, potential reward.

gdx-bounce

JNUG  and our sell off.

If you bought the OCT lows with JNUG and were stopped out with the first big reversal day, it saved you from losses. You actually had gains.  Selling 1/2 way through the daily cycle was even quite profitable, since it went from $9.50 to $15. I keep hearing that “Buying Oct lows was just horrible”by someone who bought JNUG.  The chart says hanging on from highs to lows was horrible, but buying at the OCT lows would have been fine with a stop.  The NOV lows trade could be good too, but I never recommend 3x etfs.  I’m pointing out that the trade actually could be huge if a solid ICL is in place.   Ignoring your stops will always pay the price. If someone decided to get cute and buy leverage later in the October daily cycle up near $13?  Yes, you got hurt. Its riskier to add leverage in the middle of a daily cycle, I usually sell there  ( I didn’t this time, because I expected an ICL in Oct.  I was stopped out).   Even if you didn’t sell, you may easily make that back soon if an ICL is now in place.

jnug-11-28

 

CONCLUSION concerning the constant negative posting Wednesday and Friday last week by 1 particular individual:  It was a personal choice to post those publicly, I choose to addressed it publicly. Gold is down pre-market, I need to prevent another overly negative highly emotional environment in the comments section.

I don’t wish to censor the posts, but I have decided that in the future if someone is constantly spreading unnecessary fear  to everyone honestly asking questions or posting comments – I will block them for the sake of my readers.  I was asked to do this last week and I didn’t, and I do regret it. There is absolutely no way to justify repeatedly replying to sincere posts with strong emotionally negative content. I do encourage discussion if you are worried, have concerns, need help deciding what to do.  It’s a great way to gather input from experienced traders, but that emotional rant went too far in scaring inexperienced traders out of  their positions with cries of absolute hopelessness in a difficult time.

I had always hoped that the comments section of my reports is where people could openly discuss in a mature helpful manner  various possibilities and trading strategies. It always has been, and we have a great group of traders and investors there.  It is very difficult to endure the selling during an ICL sell off alone, and many here hold core positions from February or March. They needed guidance and encouragement .

  Helpful talk like that can have a calming affect, and others may be able to chime in and offer help too.  I am also often there to help answer questions, but I couldn’t even stand wading through the verbal diarrhea that was being thrown around Wednesday and again Friday. Some newer viewers may have thought that this person was a good trader, and then when they saw reply after reply to others posts or questions thoughts expressing perosnal horror and extreme fear? They would be shaken from what the reports were saying.   Was this very encouraging for my new readers to see? Newer sign ups do not know the amount of profits and %-Gains that we all made in prior trading all through out 2016.  I had been receiving emails that peoples accounts doubled and tripled from the last 2 ICLs in Precious Metals and Energy, and now all they see is someone spreading fear and hopelessness taking the entire trading room down?

  I started to receive several concerned  emails asking me to block the poster Wednesday, so that those needing some help wouldn’t be scared out of holding.  Others bailed out of their positions when he expressed utter hopelessness, absolutely no reason to believe this selling will ever end.  My job suddenly became that much harder under the sell off, trying to reassure some without having to censor comments.  Finally I feel the need to discuss this in todays report. I will block extreme negative posters going forward, it is unhealthy and helps no one.   I’m not ‘ Ticked off ‘ or ‘Angry’, but I want to say that I was disappointed on behalf of my readers. I had way more than enough work to do last week without the added concerns that others experienced. I do not want an apology, I want a better future experience at an ICL, and I will make sure that we get that here.  Let’s help each other and make this a good trading community.  It is fine to express fear and uncertainty, but there is a limit and accountability.  We only get 2 ICLs per year on average, we can’t avoid that. Posting in a way that tears others down, or builds others up, or not posting at all,  is a personal choice.

217 replies
  1. Ann
    Ann says:

    Your GDX bearish wedge day trade looks to have hit its target premarket. Now lets see if it can grind higher thru the day (fingers crossed)

  2. MarkM
    MarkM says:

    Yen weakness is weighing on gold this morning. Saw that commercial traders are now long the Yen. A good sign that a rally is coming – which should also help gold.

  3. ben lockhart
    ben lockhart says:

    lows look to be close now.. DXY is near to 103.3 mega resistance, and SIL is close to mega support at 30; GDX 19.75.. lots of panic about nothing IMO.. you do a good job Alex – don’t let the moaning get you down.

    • chartfreak1
      chartfreak1 says:

      Thx Ben,

      No, I’m fine. I just got a bit concerned about others. Its just a blip in time, behind us now, but some were rattled a bit and that affects me.

      It’s all good now.

  4. Cal Staggers
    Cal Staggers says:

    Wonderful report, Alex – and you handled a difficult situation masterfully. A positive comments section is one of the many aspects of your work that sets you apart!

    I have a question about 2 of your charts – the Gold & GDX charts that are both dated 11/23/16: Has the indicator in the bottom box crossed over the average in each of those (yet)?

    • Geurt.
      Geurt. says:

      Cal…. very well said: “Wonderful report, Alex – and you handled a difficult situation masterfully”. This is leadership my dear friends. Master Alex knows what he is doing? Thanks Cal, I’m glad you see this.

    • chartfreak1
      chartfreak1 says:

      Thx Cal – the comments section is important to some , to be able to reason on things. I hated to write what I wrote, it was just a minor period of time, but I got feedback and some were damaged by it. I’d like to help keep things balanced a bit more. Negative comments are fine, “I’m losing on 5 of my trades, should I sell?” That’s all fine, but excessive fears can throw people off their game. We all live & learn and adapt.

      So Yes, I’ll attach a current chart . I have noticed that that OCT low still acted like an ICL and the 3 day sharp sell off was a stand out difference, so I am still watching to see if that drop is an extension of that last intermediate cycle, or the start of something new?
      .
      I got a cross on the bottom 2 boxes, that is good – but the upper box needs a price thrust or it doesn’t respond as quickly .

      https://uploads.disquscdn.com/images/273abbfe734db2d1e1ea6adca2c024397291546e2b4c9a98f9e9cdc217b93dcd.jpg

  5. Glmus
    Glmus says:

    We are half way into the often crazy first hour. My stocks are a sea of red except for GSS. However, none are below the lows of a couple of days ago. That is a very good sign (I think).

  6. Ken
    Ken says:

    The following is a list of Gold Jr. stocks that I am going to begin acquiring today with the basis that the DCL is in AND most likely an ICL also. Risk Reward is excellent.
    AUMN EGO EXK GORO PPP SAND VGZ
    All are defensible with a stop below the recent lows…… 🙂

    • R Byram
      R Byram says:

      Ken it was 20 days ago that I/we bought and this thrashing began and shook our confidence, and you managed to stay on the sidelines until today? Good on you. best of luck. I’ve still got plenty of skin in the game and will be watching to see if we can clear the early Nov highs or if we have something else going on here.

      • Ken
        Ken says:

        Au contraire my friend….. 🙂
        I am still holding my SLV and GDX Call Leaps, which I have been hedging on occasion.
        I also still hold a core of Metal jr. stocks as a core hold, some of the above list will become core additions.

      • Cason
        Cason says:

        Same here, really need to see a power move before I’ll be able to add. Unfortunate, but I can’t add any risk here.

    • Siva
      Siva says:

      i really agree with you, last week friday i nibble EGO, NGD, BTG, ASM few others. All are doing doing ok. Personally i don’t like PPP (so for every time i used burn my fingers). The rest i made decent profit.

      • Ken
        Ken says:

        For me these are strictly Cycle and TA plays for me with stops in place.
        Fundamental risks need to be addressed for sure……

        • chartfreak1
          chartfreak1 says:

          That is what I like about the current set up, the RISK /REWARD says ( According to cycle count ) That these lows should hold, my risk is controlled with a stop below the lows, and we should get a push higher soon.

          IF WE DO NOT, something really seems wrong. nd I am going to discuss this in the next report.

      • Cason
        Cason says:

        SAND has been one of my favorites in the past, but hasn’t held up as well through Oct-Nov daily cycle as a few others. I’ll be selling on a rebound and re-allocating. I own AUMN, VGZ, EXK from Ken’s list

        • chartfreak1
          chartfreak1 says:

          I keep looking at that VGZ chart and I really think that once this gets going ( If we still have a bull market in tact here) it should really do well. It could also form a giant cup & return to former 2016 highs.

          And thx for posting – I appreciate your being here 🙂

  7. Ken
    Ken says:

    GDX:
    Assuming the May Low was an ICL:
    I am counting 5 DCL’s in this current ICL. GDX could make a lower low and extend this current 5th. DCL and if so I will ReEnter again at that time………but this is the time to consider some exposure. imo

          • chartfreak1
            chartfreak1 says:

            Actually Pankef

            Look back at the Bull move from 2000 to 2008, and sometimes I clearly see ICLs, but other times I do not.

            I do have indicators that alert me to an ICL, and they triggered in May, so to me the selling isn’t always scary. Also, I do remember many that would not buy the May ICL ( maybe just expecting more downside since it seemed mild to some? )

            Bear market ICL’s are very deep and scary, but I have found that the bull market ICL’s can be more prolonged sideways and down. I don’t really find them to be missing though. Just my take on that .

          • pankef
            pankef says:

            Yes and the 1st one of this bull market , assuming of course this is a bull. The previous cyclical bull of 2008-2011 had two that I see. One in mid 2009 and one more in Feb 2010

  8. Mark Giangreco
    Mark Giangreco says:

    Alex: A novice question on cycles: is there any room to argue that the DCL for GDX was November 14th and that we may be just burning time as we consolidate in this pattern until the cycle runs out and we now must move lower? I see your count on GOLD and your suggestion this should be a DCL but I’m not sure of your count on GDX.

    • Cason
      Cason says:

      I have that worry. Really burning time, badly. At some point we’ll be too late in the cycle to rally nicely. Not yet, though. Jobs report this Friday, OPEC tomorrow, Fed 13-14 Dec, maybe something will be a catalyst. I’d like to see at least a reactionary bounce ahead of next rate decision.

      • chartfreak1
        chartfreak1 says:

        I was thinking of how the timing could work out too.

        – A run higher and a dip starting at the rate hike?

        -or a run higher and quick dip into the rate hike time period, then a day or 2 after the rate hike is the dcl?

        That rate hike ‘timing’ seems like it will affect this one way or another.

        • Cason
          Cason says:

          That was mostly my thinking. Timing wise could hit a cycle high just ahead of Fed. A selloff in immediate reaction could put in the DCL. Also, if the 1st Daily cycle is kinda crappy due to rate hike fears, that could make the 2nd one just that much better. We have some recently (but this would have been during bear market) where the 1st was ho-hum or even returned all the way back to the lows but the 2nd was a blast off. So, that wouldn’t be out of the question.

    • chartfreak1
      chartfreak1 says:

      To answer your question, I should have said that it would not be acting normally if that was the case. It doesn’t fit, and I can explain why in the next report.

      • Mark Giangreco
        Mark Giangreco says:

        That would be great! Build my confidence and understanding:). You made a comment yesterday, paraphrasing, on what you will be looking for over the next week or two. Could we continue in this pattern for that length of time and still have room to run higher within this cycle, if that’s what you were referring to? Poorly worded but if that could be addressed if possible in the report. Thanks Alex.

        • chartfreak1
          chartfreak1 says:

          I understood that perfectly.

          I have seen it, but it gets a bit nerve wracking the longer we go sideways. I really like to see early bursts higher just to be able to get some space between the price and the lows, but at times I have seen a sideways move and then a quick sharp run higher and then a higher low in a shallow drop to a DCL.

          Not ideal after what just happened in Novembers sharp 3 day sell off, because the OCT lows looked fine and the sideways move slightly higher seemed ok too.

          I will discuss this in the next report.

  9. Glmus
    Glmus says:

    I was curious about the stocks that took off in Dec/Jan. Although this is not perfect (what is?) I found that many, not all, of the best winners started their run after passing their 50 wema. Everyone with a charting program can check this. Although we are hoping to buy this pullback, I am once again looking at stocks that are above their wema as a screen to pass knowing full well that this concept might only be good catching the start of runs, not pullbacks. In any case, this can be considered to be a sign of relative strength. Note: Breaking the 50 wema downward WAS NOT a good way to exit.

      • Glmus
        Glmus says:

        Sorry I am late. I went to take a nap because things were slow. I just got up and things haven’t changed much in my acct for an hour, still green however. Re your question:
        Golds above 50wema: GSS, GSV, AKG, RGLD, IAG, BTG, XPL, NEM, GORO, VGZ, NAK .
        Silver: HL, PAAS, CDE, MAG, EXK, FSM, SSRI, GPL.
        Misc: TCK, CLF, VALE, WRN, KLDX, AUMN, BVN, PVG
        I own some of these. I keep this information on my watch list. Let me know whenever you are curious. TC2000 labels some differently than pure gold and pure silver. I hope I covered the ones of interest.

  10. Bob
    Bob says:

    I’m a new member. I remember seeing charts of a 7-year trading cycle on the XAU that has been very consistent in producing major bottoms. It is scheduled to bottom in mid-late December. Possible we hang around for another 2 weeks or so? I’ll need to become familiar with your terminology of ICL and DCL. But is appears ICL is a much more significant trading low. Can any of you give me your favorite gold stocks for long term holdings? I have been scaling into GDXJ below 34.5, but I’m not familiar with many of the low priced names I see in discussion here. Thanks!

  11. Dave
    Dave says:

    What is it with intraday inverse H&S patterns in gold… got another one today that’s almost identical to the one yesterday. Hopefully we can clear the neckline and make some good upward progress this afternoon!

    • Shermo
      Shermo says:

      yep, this looks like it is going to add up to a big multi day pop at any time….been trading the 5 minute each day on jnug/jdst but now am just sticking with jnug long as time is running out and coiling for some kind of up move and dollar may have topped…..we’ll see……keeping my ear close to Alex’s incredible insights!!!

  12. Glmus
    Glmus says:

    Some good news. I just found that my stocks are positive over all, like $150. Only about half are green however. I’ll take it. I started with all reds this AM. I have many hourly buy signals and several daily buys. JNUG, although red, has a daily buy as do GDX and GDXJ. I hope that we can get this upturn to accelerate.

  13. Dave
    Dave says:

    would love to see AG close today above the 50 sma… it’s been running quite nicely over the past few hrs.

    • chartfreak1
      chartfreak1 says:

      Check out AG with a 300sma on a 1 yr or 6 month chart. It has acted like a floor so well, that one could keep a stop just a little below it

      AG also has it’s lows in OCTOBER, and the November sell off was mild relatively speaking.

  14. marinho
    marinho says:

    Alex,
    it looks more and more that this low in November is an ICL in gold. couple of days that we get hit and then come back up,

  15. chartfreak1
    chartfreak1 says:

    There are Miners appearing to be setting up for a run higher.

    A few are MAG, PAAS, PVG, DRD, AG, GPL, GSS, among others. It is encouraging to see at this point.

    • pankef
      pankef says:

      and from a bigger picture standpoint, HL is one of those stocks that held its 2008 lows, so the next bull market (assuming it has begun) could see this stock in the high teens in no time

  16. pankef
    pankef says:

    Here’s a “what if” scenario that I want to throw out here for possible consideration/discussion;
    What if the current rally (or expected next rally) fails to break the highs but gets up to 94-100 (XAU) with gold rallying to 1300-1350 and the ensuing decline takes gold to new bear market lows but the miners do not confirm but simply get down to say XAU 57-62, with this being the final bottom in gold and miners experiencing in reality just a major retest of the Jan 2016 lows. After that, the real bull begins, with miners exploding higher and gold slowly keeping pace while IT reserves its next major leg up towards the latter part of the cycle.
    This scenario is just an “if” and is predominantly addressed to position traders/investors; thus “quick traders” need not concern themselves.

    • chartfreak1
      chartfreak1 says:

      I’ve had a chart for 11 months that backs that scenario, but I didnt want to alarm anyone.

      Back then I was using it to show that a run to new highs above prior Cycles, is not a guarantee of an end to the bear market ( if that makes sense)

          • Maria
            Maria says:

            …. and I shall .. on bended knee 😉

            ps. not that i agreed with him .. but i do have an easier time counting Gold, Silver AND Oil as ABCs and not Impulses… granted I am just a novice .. but dang.. it’s a forced effort for me to count them the legs as impulses…

          • pankef
            pankef says:

            I have been involved in this game since the late 70’s. I have never met an Elliott guy who can tell me where we are NOW except always falling back on the “alternates”. When the move finally plays out, they always have a count available to satisfy the move. Not that I have a problem with hedging one’s bets but to constantly “worry” about the “alternates” there can never be any decisive action taken.

          • Maria
            Maria says:

            giggle .. yes, I know & this is exactly why I haven’t gone “all in” on my efforts to learn EW theory … ;o)
            there are ALWAYS extensions, or truncation’s, etc etc… but, in my limited time studying cycle theory– that too has kind of a similar component where cycles “stretch” —
            soooo … i just use it with a grain of salt — just another tool in my gardening shed so to speak, but continue to research and learn what I can in large part because of a couple good friends here urging me to continue my studies…
            Everyday class is “In Session” … :o)
            LifeIsGood

          • chartfreak1
            chartfreak1 says:

            True – Cycles can stretch below a swing low, but when you have a ‘confirmed swing low’ in the right timing…you have really good risk reward .

            Seldom do I see a confirmed DCL give it up, unless it runs the full daily cycle first.

            my 2 cents – free to you

          • Ken
            Ken says:

            AND if it is at a corrective wave EW wise…….odds are with you !
            With defined risks !
            my 3 cents – bill in the mail 🙂

          • Maria
            Maria says:

            ding ding ding… exactly — :o)
            I very much like using the two together… I’m not quite there yet, but I can see a light at the end of the tunnel ….. feels pretty good & is very ‘rewarding’ when they do come together though. ;o)

          • Cason
            Cason says:

            My issue with both, by the time you know you’re wrong it’s too late! The EW count morphs or you goobered your cycle count – by the time you figure that out, your down, sometimes big.

          • Chris
            Chris says:

            Very similar to you ‘pankef’ since the very early 80’s and have come to the exact same conclusions! Used to subscribe to EWI for a period of years and I can’t tell you how many times their major wave counts changed AFTER the events. But the new wave counts fitted beautifully then!! And they are meant to be some of the ‘best in class’ at EW theory and certainly charge that way!!

          • Chris
            Chris says:

            It can definitely have it’s uses Ken but one of MANY of your tools I suspect. In this case I was specifically referring to a call that Maria had mentioned, made on a potential pattern that started back in 1980 in silver and have simply become very skeptical of those MAJOR wave pattern calls. But at the end of the day, whatever you can make work for you is all that matters and certainly not what anyone else thinks of the methodology.

          • Ken
            Ken says:

            No worries Chris….I understand.
            Btw….that chart that Maria posted is one ugly EW count so much wrong so little time…… 🙂

          • Maria
            Maria says:

            ha! it’s not mine….. i just tried to quickly imitate what he had…. it’s on youtube if you care to see it.

          • Chris
            Chris says:

            I’m going to open a bottle of red instead!! It’s almost 10pm here and time for some ‘down time’!! Lol 🙂

      • pankef
        pankef says:

        like i said, just a discussion. Be prepared for anything at all times, but stay the course with the probabilities!

      • pankef
        pankef says:

        if the 1170 low holds, i find 1220 “not enough” of a bounce. If we break lower towards the lower 1100’s then yes, 1220 may be enough

    • Maria
      Maria says:

      I watched a video this morning that showed silver (on a monthly chart) as one giant flat …. with us right now in the “B” leg up with a Ginormous “C” to follow to the downside…. that looked pretty ugly. Not to get into politics, but he also mentioned that the downward movement in gold/silver also would coincide nicely with “Trumponomics” roaring economy to come….

      • Chris
        Chris says:

        Totally guessing here but was he showing the flat starting from 2011? If so, then presumably he had A down ending in Dec ’15 and as you intimate in the B leg up now. But even if that was the case I would suggest that Dec’15 to Jul ’16 would have to be an ‘a’ of the B leg, we are now in/ending the ‘b’ with a ‘c’ leg to come to complete that much larger B!? Does that make sense? And if so, then that means we are still looking at a powerful rally leg in the near term to complete that larger B!

          • Chris
            Chris says:

            So he’s talking from the MAJOR peak in 1980!! I get really skeptical about these mega long term patterns but from what I can see from your chart we are in the middle of some kind of B leg higher so another rally leg to follow? All I know is from my own analysis I want to see us regain the 300 day ema (historically stay above it in bull markets) and then stay above it on ALL future corrections. If we regain it and lose it again after this I will be far from convinced we are in a new long term mega bull market and will adjust things accordingly. But one step at a time and the next step should be a decent rally phase. So we’ll see where that gets to first of all and then take things from there! 🙂

          • Maria
            Maria says:

            yeah… like i said … I’m not saying I agree .. just scanning my eyeballs & running my ‘shop vac’ fingers across a variety of data as the men upstairs are very hungry – ravenous in fact & I constantly have to feed them or they get angry with me …. ;o)

  17. Glmus
    Glmus says:

    TRX (own) is not over its 50 wema . However, it has a lovely daily triple bottom at .49. Today’s volume (as of about 25 min to close) is less than the other two .49 low days.

  18. Glmus
    Glmus says:

    This has been a very strange day for my acct. After an initial negative push, it became green a few hours ago. But it only varied $100 or so during the last few hours. I don’t know if that is good or bad. Usually there is more up and/or down. Alex???

    • littletimeleft
      littletimeleft says:

      from S-3 filing dated 11-16-16:

      On April 7, 2016, the Company entered into the a Share Purchase Agreement (the “Laramide SPA”) with Laramide Resources for the sale of its wholly-owned subsidiary Hydro Resources, Inc., which holds the Company’s Churchrock and Crownpoint projects. Under the terms of the Laramide SPA, the Company is set to transfer ownership of the Churchrock and Crownpoint projects in exchange for the following consideration from Laramide Resources at closing:·

      $5.25 million in cash; and·

      $7.25 million promissory note, secured by a deed of trust or mortgage over the projects. The note will have a three-year term and carry an initial interest rate of 5% which then increases to 10% upon Laramide Resources decision regarding commercial production at the Churchrock project. Principal payments of approximately $2.4 million are due and payable on the anniversary of the closing of the transaction in each of 2017, 2018 and 2019. Interest will be payable on a quarterly basis, provided however that no interest will be payable prior to the first principal payment in 2017.

      The closing under the Laramide SPA is subject to various conditions, including, without limitation, completion of a financing by Laramide Resources on commercially reasonable terms and in such amount as is necessary to fund the $5.25 million purchase price and certain customary and required consents and releases of and by third parties, including RCF. Either party could originally terminate the Laramide SPA if the closing thereunder had not occurred on or before September 30, 2016. The Company initially expected that the Laramide SPA would close by September 30, 2016, but Laramide Resources has experienced delays in obtaining the necessary funding to close the transaction. As a result, the Company and Laramide Resources agreed to extend the Laramide SPA until November 30, 2016 in exchange for an extension payment of $250,000 which was paid to the Company on October 21, 2016. Based on continuing discussions with Laramide Resources, the Company believes that the funding will be in place to close by the November 30, 2016 extended deadline.

  19. Cason
    Cason says:

    Breaking- Saudi Oil Minister out with positive comments- deal is near – during OPEC mtg. WTF up over 8% pre-market! (Source: CNBC Mobile)

Comments are closed.