Balancing Risks

With the recent volatility in the markets, we have seen the equity markets sell off, Banking and the XLF were hit hard, Oil & Energy stocks sold down, NATGAS bottomed , and The Miners and Metals have been volatile in their own way.  In this environment, we had to try to find a few trades while balancing the risk.  There are times that trade set ups are everywhere, yet at other times, like during these choppy volatile markets, it may be best to take it slow, keep position size smaller, and for some it is even best to just wait. This choppy market action eventually sets up the next series of trades.

Despite the choppiness, we still found a few bullish trade set ups and some have already been really rewarding. I want to point out a few more of these trade set ups after we review the market activity for Monday.

 

SPX – The General markets gapped down and then put in a reversal around the 50sma. You could buy this with a stop below the 50sma, but it is hard to tell if all of the selling is really done without some follow through. The ‘safer’ buy is still ahead. We’ll see what Tuesday brings.

 

Note: As convincing as that reversal looks, I still see signs of weakness in the General Markets.  A little follow through on the upside may help to alleviate that, and there will be plenty of time left if the lows are in place.

 

USD – We have been looking for a swing low in the USD sell off.  The USD broke below the prior dcl and then put in reversal.  This could be a shake out and if the USD is ready to put in that dcl here, Golds run higher could be finished.

 

WTIC – Oil put in a reversal weeks ago, and then dropped and made a lower low last week with another reversal. We saw a reversal Monday too. It hasn’t been able to get back above the 10sma yet.  Reversals are nice, but I’d like to see a sign of strength to get back above the 200sma. Notice that each swing low recently was not a good trade set up and that gets frustrating.

 

NATGAS – Sill acting correctly above the 50 and 200sma. We should see $3 hold.

 

GOLD – So far Gold is acting exactly as expected. It was bullish with 2 R.T. Daily cycles, so I expected it to reach the 200sma and stall there. So far we have no break of the Feb highs yet and if the USD bottomed, Gold may roll over from here.

This shows how GOLD ran right to that 200sma and just gave it up.

SILVER – Silver did exactly as expected too, but this one actually looks like it wants to break out.  We’ll see.

As expected

GDX – The reversal in the USD had me wanting to short GDX here, but the 10sma is pinching in now.  I shorted it last Wednesday, thinking that it could drop to the 10sma, and that gave me a $1+ trade in a 3x etf  ( and maybe more if it continued down).  Now I want to see if GDX breaks up or down from here.  It is day 11 for Gold and I’ve been expecting a possible top to come between day 8-12.  It CAN go a few more days and still roll over, but that is the average.

 

LET’S DISCUSS SOME OTHER TRADES

 

CGIX – what a beauty this turned out to be. Once it got going, I mentioned that this reminded me of the NAK set up. I sold out on todays run higher, some of it at nearly 100% gains. I hope to get a pull back for re-entry.  The weekly chart scares me because it looks like it could just keep going higher.  With NAK I never sold my entire position as long as it acted correctly….

CGIX – This is now hit $5.30 and doesn’t it look like it could just keep running. Yes it does.

OVAS –  OVAS popped today too, so here is hoping that OVAS does what CGIX did.  It was up 11.7 % –  you know I love that base  🙂  I may even add if it pulls back on lighter volume.

 

OVAS WKLY

MACK  is the next one on my radar. With a sign of strength, I will likely take a position  ( Above the 50sma & 10sma, both are at $3.12).

SWN – I bought SWN today, I have been watching it struggle at the 20sma for months.  It put in a small base recently, and I think it is going to break out higher soon  ( NATGAS).

I posted this in the comments section today and also mentioned that I bought it.

SWN WEEKLY – A break above $8.19 could trigger buying , since technicians look for a break above the weekly 10ma.

CRK WEEKLY – WOW WHAT A BASE, let’s zoom in…

CRK – Earnings were released 1 month ago. This is also Oil and GAS. Rounding bottom with a proper MACD set up.

 

OAS –  This is an old favorite here, we traded this last January onward and doubled and tripled our money.  I want you to notice that OAS NEVER looked bearish since then. With all of the Energy stocks selling off, OAS ran from $4 to $17 in 2016 and has only gradually drifted down to $12.  THAT SAYS A LOT.  Oversold and near the weekly 50ma, OAS tagged the 200sma on the daily chart today. I believe that this is still a buy, since it returned to the 200sma and held up.

CLF is also ta the 200sma with the market sell off

CLF WKLY

AKS AT THE 200 SMA –  Acting as possible support, a reversal and swing low could be bought with a stop.

 

 

NAK –  NAK got moving off of that 10sma today, up 6%

 

 

RIG – Also sitting on the 200sma and bounced off of it a few times. If Oil bottoms with a dcl this could at least bounce to the 50sma  ( 38%).

 

SO we see things falling in place with our expectations.  NATGAS has been bullish, The USD is possibly about to put in a swing low and GOLD & MINERS could be topping. I’d like to see a little follow through in other areas for clarity, but things are shaping up!   Also the Biotech stocks that were beaten down and have been base building are  exploding and running higher despite the market selling off.  CGIX and OVAS have made great gains even with the markets selling off.  Patience is paying off. Lets see what our Tuesday trading brings our way. 🙂

 

.

~ALEX

.

VTSM was mentioned via email to me by a reader  ( Thanks Chuck!) , and it is also running higher against a market sell off.   On the daily, however,  it is a bit too extended to offer  a safe low risk entry.  The weekly chart is another good looking base,  so put this on your watch-list and it may become a good buy candidate on a pull back. It also has a huge gap overhead.

106 replies
      • Ann
        Ann says:

        That’s a heartbreaker, especially when you just were in it. Probably why it was up when all the other miners were selling off.

        • chartfreak1
          chartfreak1 says:

          Yeah, that is a heart breaker. You never can tell though, these buy outs come out of no where.

          I have seen a few Miners that look pretty strong while the others look weak.

          SBGL & SA were bullish 6 month charts too

  1. Kenny
    Kenny says:

    Note over my desk: Sometimes it’s better to do nothing than do something…I believe this is one of those times right now till things line up properly.

    • Steve Tytler
      Steve Tytler says:

      I’m 100% in cash and very happy waiting for a nice “fat pitch” trade. Unfortunately, those happen only a 2-4 times per year so you have to be patient. In the past, I have had a great run on a “fat pitch” trade, then chipped away at my profits by trying to trade in choppy, sideways markets. For my style of trading (riding a trend) that is the kiss of death.

    • chartfreak1
      chartfreak1 says:

      I have to watch it, it needs time. It could bull flag, consolidate for many days like NAK used to. Every case is different and often it takes observation.

        • chartfreak1
          chartfreak1 says:

          ‘Time” – exactly.

          And sometimes I miss the pull back because it doesnt pull back as far as I had hoped, but it is better than jumping in high and having it drop & roll for 2 weeks before moving higher.

          I do think it could do something similar to NAK…look how that POPPED higher and then slid sideways to down over a few days, repeat repeat repeat.

  2. chartfreak1
    chartfreak1 says:

    I took a small starter position ( VERY DANGEROUS) in JDST with GOLD & SILVER higher, and it is actually doing very well.

    MIners are pretty much acting as expected

    • Glenfidd
      Glenfidd says:

      I’m with you on the JDST- watching the action in miners is frustrating. Eg, Silver up 1/2% and first Majestic down 2.3%. Clearly talking my position here.

      You mention it is a starter position- what, if anything, will you look for to add to it?

      • chartfreak1
        chartfreak1 says:

        Hey Glenfidd

        I am watching GDX & GDXJ. They are dropping on light volume so far, and I dont like that because daily charts still resemble a bull flaggy type thing…however GOLD & SILVER up and Miners down, 3rd daily cycle, etc etc it is just a matter of time.

        So I will add most likely when GDX takes out & closes below the 10 sma, GDXJ I use the 13 sma, and a close below that might signal to me that the downside is winning.

        I am seeing that now – so I may wait for the close ( I still hate this light volume selling, but Miners can take quickly under any condition).

          • chartfreak1
            chartfreak1 says:

            Agree…even with that, riding the 3x rocket ships, it can be alarming when a simple 3% move on GDXJ higher comes in – even if its a fake out : )

            If we get that mid day bounce in Miners, mid day dip in JDST, I may add to it.
            Miners just look weak with Gold & Silver tagging the 200sma / 3rd daily cycle, etc etc

    • chartfreak1
      chartfreak1 says:

      QEP, Thats an interesting chart and has good upside potential.
      Was there something in particular that you liked about it ( 5 waves down?).
      The MACD divergence looks good.

    • chartfreak1
      chartfreak1 says:

      It is breaking out higher now, so I am comfortable, but I think for me it would be a break below recent lows. So thats about 6% from my entry. I’d actually have a ‘loose’ stop, so it may be $7 instead of the recent low of $7.20.

  3. Ann
    Ann says:

    Alex-would you look at BWEN for me? I’m in from mid 5’s, not large, but where would you exit based on this move? Thanks

    • chartfreak1
      chartfreak1 says:

      Too bad it’s not a large position, I really like that 3 year weekly chart.

      The current move can complete around $7.50 and consolidate, but this chart looks good. In the bigger pic it looks like it wants to go back to highs 3 years ago ( in the $13 area). It just broke out of a 9 month base.

      Short term trade you can take profits anywhere, but if you wanted to just forget about it and use a rising stop , that might work out well too. it may just run

      • Ann
        Ann says:

        Thanks- I was just forgetting about it, until the profit exceeded my expectation so soon. Good problem to have, but I am lousy at exits : )

  4. chartfreak1
    chartfreak1 says:

    Just a heads up, but we all know that 3x ETFs need to be timed correctly and handled by experienced traders only.

    I believe that JDST ( Now at $15) will be dropping to $14.60 by the close. I am adding near that area. I may or may not be here in the comments section , so I want to say that this is not a recommendation. I am seeing something that tells me that Miners should bounce from now onward. IF they just go sideways at the lows, I do not know if I will add to my current position.

    $14.60 – $14 70 area is my target. This is not a recommendation, I think that waiting for a swing high in GOLD and GDX and a break below the 10sma is a safer bet.

    Waiting for the sell off DCL/ICL is the BEST trade that you will make this spring : ) Waiting for THAT is probably best. Topping Miners can be choppy and tricky.

    We also are starting to see other LONG trade set ups working out, I will have more of those as we go forward, for those that prefer LONG trades

      • chartfreak1
        chartfreak1 says:

        Good question, It has crossed my mind, but NAK didnt trade with Miners on the last run. It traded like a natural resource stock .

        With NAK I am looking at the 200sma, and even the 10sma has now been doing rather well at holding price up.
        Take a look at CLF, AKS, X, etc etc

        NAK can run on its own merit , but the thought about ” Miners dropping, will NAK?” Did cross my mind.

        JDST is hedging my NAK currently : (

        NAK above the 10sma is great, above the 200sma is good. Below that and I’m out.

          • chartfreak1
            chartfreak1 says:

            Here is a better way to put it.

            1. Look at NAK in October through Dec 2016
            2. Look at GDX GDXJ in October through dec 2016 ; -)

            Clearly, Nak didnt follow Miners, so there is a chance. Nak above the 200sma is encouraging.

      • chartfreak1
        chartfreak1 says:

        It dropped first to $14.73 from the $15 when I wrote,. I did say $14.60 – $14.70 was my target, but it got some buyers quickly

        Not as deep as I wanted, but I got my pullback to buy

  5. Steve Tytler
    Steve Tytler says:

    Alex, please keep an eye on QQQ/TQQQ for me and others who want to get on the stock market bandwagon. TQQQ is doing a hell of a job of teasing me, but not delivering the DEEP drop I’ve been waiting/hoping for in order to make a low risk entry. Hope I’m not already too late. 🙁

    • chartfreak1
      chartfreak1 says:

      True, TQQQ didnt drop as much as you may have wanted , but the NASDAQ did drop to and pretty much tag the 50sma and put in a reversal. A low risk buy could have been to buy the reversal and put a stop under yesterdays low.

      The safer buy is buying a swing low, and we have one now.
      Today moving above the 10sma puts a swing in place . It is tricky with XLF dropping so sharply and recovering with light volume, but it usually takes time to know if the low id THE LOW or just another dip and a lower low later.

      • Steve Tytler
        Steve Tytler says:

        Yes, yesterday morning would have been a good buying opp … but I was not paying attention to the market then, slept in and missed the dip. By the time I checked the market, most of the recovery had already taken place. I was hoping for a dip today … but no such luck.

    • Cason
      Cason says:

      Credit to Ken yesterday calling bottom!! I got convinced on today’s move. Buying the next pullback. Except I spent most of my TQQQ money on bios already! And some JDST.

      • chartfreak1
        chartfreak1 says:

        Read this in a kind, warm , friendly manner…. :- )

        I’m going to have to address this in the next report. Both you and Steve and an email that I got are saying that you ‘missed the lows’ and are saying you’ll have to wait and buy the next pullback? Steve feels he missed it too.

        So I want to explain that if the low was yesterday, we usually wait for a swing for confirmation, which would be follow through upside and if we had that today….doesn”t that make today DAY 1? Day 1 is too late? If day 2 open a little down, is that too late?

        So if you think yesterday was the low, and it sounds like you do, then today was the swing, and this is day 1- If you feel that it is too late and you need to buy the next pullback, do you think the pullback will be lower than day 1? It won’t, right?

        If it breaks the lows, it fails anyway.

        I hope what I am saying is making sense, because I cant understand why day 1 is too late and missed the move and why waiting for a pullback days from now is better than buying day 2?

        I will mention this briefly in the report that I am writing now.

        • Cason
          Cason says:

          Hey boss. Totally took this the right way. And I think my comments weren’t clear. Let me try again: 1) Nice call by Ken! I expected lower but was wrong and Ken nailed it. Great job. 2) I received what I considered confirmation when S&P stretched higher in the afternoon. So, what I meant to say wasn’t “I missed it” but “this looks like confirmation”.

          I had a technician that I followed before I found C.F. that always waited for a breakout and then bought the first pullback afterwards. So, instead of chasing if we, for example, capped higher today, I’d wait for a little pullback and a better entry. So a better way to phrase might have been “waiting for a desirable entry point”. Make more sense?
          Thanks for sharing and the confirmation that it’s not too late. I’ve bought so darn many tops in my life that sometimes it’s tough (mentally) when you want to catch absolute bottom. But that isn’t just always possible!

  6. Erik Sven
    Erik Sven says:

    It’s my birthday today. Chef is 42. Feel free to post your best recommendations as gifts. *bort bort!* Also, JASO is kicking butt. Look at that volume come in!

    • Maria
      Maria says:

      i tried to short jnug earlier… got the dreaded ‘this security is not available to short today’

  7. Aniket
    Aniket says:

    Alex, how on the earth you projected that JDST will go to $14.70 area? It went there. Amazing call. Seriously.

  8. Bill
    Bill says:

    Alex, does the news Today on the law suite negatively effect OVAS going forward? Looks like it survived the day, I’m thinking its probably okay.

  9. chartfreak1
    chartfreak1 says:

    So TRUMP announced that they are eliminating government overreach with excesses regulations, and he announced that the War on Coal is over.

    Did many coal stocks survive??

    CLD is Coal I beleive.

    I remember Patriot Coal, ACI, BTU and a few others

    BTU changed to BTUUQ, chart looks great with that news, but I think they filed for BK last Spring, not sure that I want to trade it. I do like that set up though and look what it did in OCTOBER!

  10. Shermo
    Shermo says:

    a jdst move like was seen in early Nov from 22.80 to 46.01 could pan out….thanks for helping us chart through this third cycle Alex!

    • chartfreak1
      chartfreak1 says:

      It played out rather well so far, Miners back tested the 50sma and stalled , Gold made it to the 200sma and stalled. It went well. Unfortunately, the 2nd daily cycle didnt give us the normal R.T. daily cycle & peaked a bit early, but maybe we;ll make it pay us back for that now : )

      • Maria
        Maria says:

        so heres a question… lets pretend this is a bull .. and we have completed 1 and 2 (im guessing that would be dcl 1 & 2 or whatever .. lol ha ha

        but heres my question…
        for “3” …counting begins again… so its 1 .. 2… 3 ..etc again… comprende? so your ‘3rd dcl” would really be 1of3 which would account for a ‘short’ wave… right?

Comments are closed.